As we know from the history of paper money, inflation is inevitable here. In a sense, we operate a paper in the regime of law-in contrast to the unwritten law-operating successfully for most of human history (including the usual interpretation of the written codes.)
inflation also gradually progressing money-losing each of its functions - from tezauryzacyjnej and measure of value-ranging collapse in the final phase operates only as a quick replacement.
In this case-actually ranks Inflation can be regarded as law-like first of these is the loss of function of the long-term stabilization of social relations. It seems that this step we are already far behind. No reasonable person should plan projects assuming the consistency of legal regulations concerning him in any field of life-that is, in a sense, is equivalent to the assumption of constant time value of money-a requirement necessary for long-term investments (or just a simple store of value). An interesting example of this is rolling over upside down most of the Family and Guardianship Code in recent years. Marriage as an economic community of today is quite different than a few years ago, the rules relating to children have changed dramatically-and apparently nobody was around, and people are guided by common sense. Unfortunately, then sometimes surprised after contact with the authorities or the judiciary-but the result of this contact is not understanding the rules, or adapt to them-but usually regret and a rebellion against the (often the obvious common sense) injustice. Legal changes worked in this case already against the law-precisely the same as mad uncoated printing works against to money.
But let us go further and question-when you print counterpart regulations will lead to hyperinflation? And how it might look like?
Probably the next step is the difficulty in determining exactly what rules apply and the difficulty-the impossibility of the border, to establish their relationship and the interpretation by professionals. At this stage we are. Here are some examples.
further consequence-quite-sense needs to be simply ignoring the order of the written law in its entirety. Right in the state of hyperinflation, of course, will be-until their replacement (with hyperinflation as money), but remain only as a justification for arbitrary use of coercive measures by the state. Although it would not sound grim-law which are not able to observe neither ordinary citizens nor even the pros, it will not function as a way of organizing society. Will simply be ignored. With the complete unpredictability of judgments no one in their right mind will risk the process-if the result will depend not on the court and common sense reasoning skills-Agents and the orientation of the recent changes regulations. A delegate who will be really familiar with the current legislation will have a rate clearly prohibitive for most potential customers. Any stories of the opening of the application, etc. will not make any sense - hard to prepare a reliable cost will be prohibitive - as much as would have wanted to ask-the Minister Ziobro-what do you say?
origins of this phenomenon can already see clearly.
course, the average police officer or it will not have a clue about their current competence (many already have) - and here the situation may develop in two ways-either behind the camera position and execution of constraint-which will bring the operation in Poland to the maxim, "Give me a man, a paragraph will be found" or not-and although it remains a bit of judicial review of the state apparatus - which in this case, she will act in complete isolation from society, and complete helplessness-exactly what you and wish you.
course, theoretically, may stop the Diet printers-but, well - I think it is so naive faith as belief in the paper to stop printing money.
Contrary, perhaps to popular belief, I believe the current legislative production and a trend about which I write for a very poor career prospects for lawyers. Just-above a critical moment, most camera justice will simply be ignored-together with the rulings of the civil courts, and simply representatives in these matters will not be needed. This will happen only when the sense of public awareness will visit the randomness and injustice of the judgments. It certainly at some point will be-although I really have no idea how much we are from that distant.
0 comments:
Post a Comment