Sunday, March 6, 2011

Artiste™ By Scott Kay, Blissful Collection

Saving Energy in the U.S. Changing the rules of the game


It is quite obvious that decrease in the amount of energy available to the average man must be associated with reduction in the average quality of life. You can save, but another name for saving is simply a belt-tightening. For many it is a necessity, but a necessity rather pleasant. Much more fun when you absolutely nothing to be reckoned with.
energy consumption can be reduced in a population of 10% in two ways: 80% of the population buys (uses) of 12.5% \u200b\u200bless energy, or 20% of the population consumes half as much as before. The latter approach is almost used in California, where he comes pretty 'new poor "or the old middle class, now living in kamperach and playing hide and seek with the police.
In Silicon Valley, where it is currently still stubbornly refuses to start the dry season and is as cold as in Poland in the summer, about a quarter of the free standing office space for rent. These are the offices, which created and continues to create a technology that we use every day siedziąc before computers. Still manufactured today are quite useful things, but there are just fewer. People who work there are useless. Capital for new start-ups is not so much at once, which means indirectly, that existing resources are already missing out on investment. Available resources we consume more and more honor and less and less to devote to improved living standards in the future, yet the current consumption and so need to limit.

Below a few photos on energy saving in the U.S.. Residents of these vehicles no longer have to pay for the houses and piles of gadgets in their meeting, they live modestly and sparingly (at least for the conditions of the United States). And by the way - the picture we see a parking lot next to the store on a Sunday afternoon: yes side, and not prior to entry - but a bit empty - is not it?

course, this does not mean that 20% of the population lives in kamperach, but the real unemployment rate fluctuates around this figure. State administrative structures are still operating, so this koczowanie is "unlawful":


standard of living of the people "slightly" different from the previous ...


As for the level of savings, of course, the number of calories in food remains the same (at least until a complete disaster), with heating below a certain few who will not back down, but I've accumulated energy consumption in industrial products will be limited. Remember that energy is not only the current in the outlet or fuel in the car but also, and perhaps above all, the energy consumed to produce longer and carry various gadgets purchased by us. Vendors of these gadgets have a problem, but on the other hand, all the belt tightening, and not only 20% "and unlucky losers" who are losing their homes and cars, and harm them in order to survive the odd jobs, living in such gruchotach. We should also bear in mind that these are the most WASP-y accustomed to the level of the middle class - the worst neighborhoods inhabited by blacks and Hispanics simply do not fit. Another thing that the free market and so would not be able to rent anything, their creditworthiness is no, do not have a permanent job with inadequate incomes (and this is required when renting), not to mention the fact that they are not able to pay cash advance for the shortest possible term of the lease (usually amounting to six months).

conclusion - to reduce energy consumption is very possible. And it looks exactly like the crisis .......


0 comments:

Post a Comment